GEM™ Conversion Cuts Steam Use by ~3,400 Tonnes per Year
The facility’s maintenance and energy team was seeking to reduce steam consumption across the site and evaluated whether replacing its existing mechanical steam traps with GEM™ Steam Traps could deliver measurable savings.
Unlike mechanical designs, GEM™ uses a calibrated full-venturi design with no moving parts, continuously discharging condensate while preventing the loss of live steam.
Thermal Energy International carried out comparative bucket testing between GEM™ Steam Traps and the site’s existing mechanical traps. Even against traps assessed as operating correctly, the results demonstrated significant steam-saving potential and indicated a project payback of approximately nine months.
The facility’s own engineers conducted an independent assessment, verifying the projected payback and identifying annual steam savings of 8.5 tonnes per trap on the 174 psi (12 bar) system and 10 tonnes per trap on the 65 psi (4.5 bar) system.
Following a full-site conversion across process equipment, plate heat exchangers, line drainage and trace heating, steam consumption was monitored against production output to verify performance across the completed installation. After seven months of metering, the facility confirmed average steam savings of approximately 1,320 lb/h at constant production, equivalent to approximately 3,400 tonnes of steam per year and €93,000 in annual savings based on energy prices at the time. The measured performance exceeded the original projections and delivered a faster payback than anticipated.
Alongside the energy savings, the conversion increased condensate return at the correct temperature, eliminated visible steam plumes and significantly reduced steam-trap maintenance.
Ten years after the initial conversion, the GEM™ Steam Traps continue to operate reliably, sustaining the steam savings, improved condensate return and reduced maintenance achieved by the project. As the steam system has expanded, the facility has continued to choose GEM™, establishing it as the site’s preferred steam-trap technology and demonstrating sustained confidence in its long-term performance.
The facility’s efficiency improvements also extended beyond the steam system to its existing CHP installation.