Thermal Energy International
  • About
    • Overview
    • Our impact to date
    • Senior Management & Board of Directors
    • Careers
  • Products
    • Our products
    • GEM steam traps >
      • GEM overview
      • GEM case studies
      • GEM brochures
      • GEM FAQ
      • GEM steam trap survey
    • FLU-ACE heat recovery >
      • Heat recovery overview
      • Heat recovery case studies
      • Heat recovery white papers
      • Heat recovery brochures
      • Heat recovery FAQ
    • BEI heat recovery >
      • BEI Overview
      • BEI Case Studies
      • Contact BEI
    • CoGeneration >
      • CoGeneration overview
      • CoGeneration case studies
    • DRY-REX biomass dryer
    • Turn-key solutions
    • SOFAME Products
  • Sectors
    • Sector applications
    • Food and beverage
    • Pulp and paper
    • Hospitals
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Chemicals and petrochemicals
    • Other industry sectors
  • News
  • Investors
  • Contact

Mechanical Steam Traps Vs. GEM Steam Traps

Industry innovators are making the switch to our patented Venturi orifice technology, here's why.

Mechanical Steam Traps

Cost of failed traps estimated at £173,200 per year 
*Based on 20 failed traps wasting 53 kg/hr each calculated below
  • 10% to 30% average annual failure rate
  • Higher fuel usage as live steam is lost
  • Maintenance costs incurred through personnel time and the purchase replacement traps
  • Unpredictable lifecycle with increased downtime due to planned and unplanned maintenance
  • Low priority and often ignored until process is affected​ ​
Case Studies

GEM™ Steam Traps 

The most efficient and reliable steam traps on the market with permanent energy savings
  • ​​10+ year no-fail performance guarantee 
  • Decreases fuel required by avoiding waste heat
  • Reduce maintenance costs to improve profitability
  • Prevents shutdown due to planned or unplanned maintenance
  • Helps ensure processes are consistent so product isn’t wasted or production needs to be stopped​​
Contact Our Team

The cost of failed traps

Trap Size
​Orifice diameter
​6 barg
​steam loss
14 barg 
steam loss
32 barg ​​Steam loss
DN15
3 mm
8 kg/hr
19​ kg/hr
43 kg/hr
DN20
8 mm
24​ kg/hr
53​ kg/hr
119 kg/hr
DN25
7.5 mm
55​ kg/hr
121​ kg/hr
270 kg/hr
DN40
10 mm
98 kg/hr
214​ kg/hr
478 kg/hr
DN50
12 mm
152 kg/hr​
335​ kg/hr
747 kg/hr
Example:
  • Steam pressure of 14 bar(g)
    = steam loss of 53 kg/hr
  • 200 Traps site, average size of DN20
  • 10% failure = 20 failed traps
​Estimate calculated as:
  • Site steam loss = 20 x 53 = 1060 kg/hr
  • Annual steam loss = 1060 x 8400 = 8904 tonnes per year
  • Steam cost = £19.45 /tonne (2.37p/kWh gas)
  • Cost of failed traps = 8,904 x 19.45 = £173,200 per year
*Table Reference: Spirax Sarco
​​This figure does not include the cost of increased maintenance, downtime caused by failed traps or make up water to replace lost steam permanent curriculum.

​FOLLOW US
Contact Thermal Energy International
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy


Copyright © 2021, Thermal Energy International Inc.
  • About
    • Overview
    • Our impact to date
    • Senior Management & Board of Directors
    • Careers
  • Products
    • Our products
    • GEM steam traps >
      • GEM overview
      • GEM case studies
      • GEM brochures
      • GEM FAQ
      • GEM steam trap survey
    • FLU-ACE heat recovery >
      • Heat recovery overview
      • Heat recovery case studies
      • Heat recovery white papers
      • Heat recovery brochures
      • Heat recovery FAQ
    • BEI heat recovery >
      • BEI Overview
      • BEI Case Studies
      • Contact BEI
    • CoGeneration >
      • CoGeneration overview
      • CoGeneration case studies
    • DRY-REX biomass dryer
    • Turn-key solutions
    • SOFAME Products
  • Sectors
    • Sector applications
    • Food and beverage
    • Pulp and paper
    • Hospitals
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Chemicals and petrochemicals
    • Other industry sectors
  • News
  • Investors
  • Contact