Thermal Energy International
  • About
    • Overview
    • Our impact to date
    • Senior Management & Board of Directors
    • Careers
  • Products
    • Our products
    • GEM steam traps >
      • GEM overview
      • GEM case studies
      • GEM brochures
      • GEM FAQ
      • GEM steam trap survey
      • Technical data
    • FLU-ACE heat recovery >
      • Heat recovery overview
      • Heat recovery case studies
      • Heat recovery white papers
      • Heat recovery brochures
      • Heat recovery FAQ
    • BEI heat recovery >
      • BEI Overview
      • BEI Case Studies
      • Contact BEI
    • CoGeneration >
      • CoGeneration overview
      • CoGeneration case studies
    • DRY-REX biomass dryer
    • Turn-key solutions
    • SOFAME Products
  • Sectors
    • Sector applications
    • Food and beverage
    • Pulp and paper
    • Hospitals
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Chemicals and petrochemicals
    • Other industry sectors
  • Media
    • News
    • Videos
  • Investors
  • Contact

Heat Recovery 101: What’s the difference between a direct-contact and an indirect-contact economizer?

9/16/2015

0 Comments

 
Direct contact condensing heat recovery system
Condensing heat recovery can be applied in two ways: direct-contact and indirect-contact systems. An indirect-contact system is simply a standard heat exchanger: water passes through tubes and the hot exhaust passes outside the tubes. Sensible heat and latent heat are transferred through the tube walls from the hot side to the cold side. By contrast, direct contact systems bring the cold water medium in direct contact with the hot gas in an open spray tower or packed spray tower to recover the heat directly by heating the water. 

Neither of these technologies is a "one size fits all" solution," so it’s best to take a look at the pros and cons of each type before making the right choice for your facility.

Some advantages and disadvantages of the two types of systems include:

Direct Contact Economizer

  • Longer life (20 to 30 years) due to neutralization of slightly acidic condensate formed within the spray tower;
  • Can produce higher water temperatures with more humid exhausts;
  • Can accept almost any kind of exhaust as a heat source, including oil boilers and dirty process exhausts, in addition to natural gas;
  • Can deliver more savings when there is lots of heat sink (user) with relatively low (140° to 170°F) temperature setpoints;
  • Significant pollution control benefit (effectively a wet scrubber, over 90% reduction of acid gases and over 50% removal of particulate matter at end of pipe), in addition to reduction of fuel use; and,
  • Less simple process, typically requires a new pump (due to loss of liquid pressure in the spray tower) and often requires a hot water recirculating loop.

Indirect Contact Economizer

  • Shorter life (5 to 15 years) due to formation of acid droplets on the outside of tube materials, resulting in potential spot corrosion due to the acidity of the droplet and the dielectric effect;
  • Can produce higher temperature water with hotter, dryer exhausts;
  • Best applied to clean, non-acidic exhausts as heat sources (natural gas exhaust);
  • Can deliver more savings when there is less heat sink (user) with relatively high (170° to 200°F) temperature setpoints;
  • Limited pollution control benefit in addition to reduction of fuel use;
  • Simpler process, typically no need for new pump or hot water recirculating loop.
 
Clearly the selection of either direct contact or indirect contact is dependent upon the specific process heating application, both on the characteristics of the heat source and the heat sink. 

For more on this topic see our white paper entitled Condensing Heat Recovery – The Final Step towards the 95% Efficient Boiler Plant, as published in Process Heating, Volume 22, Number 2. 

0 Comments

    Blog comment policy

    RSS Feed


    Archives

    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    February 2021
    November 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015

    Categories

    All
    Backlog
    Climate 101
    Cogeneration
    Deferred Maintenance
    GEM
    Heat Recovery
    Hospitals
    Maintenance
    Oil & Gas
    Pulp And Paper
    Steam Trap
    Venturi Orifice

Sign up for TEI News

​FOLLOW US
Contact Thermal Energy International
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy


Copyright © 2021, Thermal Energy International Inc.
  • About
    • Overview
    • Our impact to date
    • Senior Management & Board of Directors
    • Careers
  • Products
    • Our products
    • GEM steam traps >
      • GEM overview
      • GEM case studies
      • GEM brochures
      • GEM FAQ
      • GEM steam trap survey
      • Technical data
    • FLU-ACE heat recovery >
      • Heat recovery overview
      • Heat recovery case studies
      • Heat recovery white papers
      • Heat recovery brochures
      • Heat recovery FAQ
    • BEI heat recovery >
      • BEI Overview
      • BEI Case Studies
      • Contact BEI
    • CoGeneration >
      • CoGeneration overview
      • CoGeneration case studies
    • DRY-REX biomass dryer
    • Turn-key solutions
    • SOFAME Products
  • Sectors
    • Sector applications
    • Food and beverage
    • Pulp and paper
    • Hospitals
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Chemicals and petrochemicals
    • Other industry sectors
  • Media
    • News
    • Videos
  • Investors
  • Contact